xbuddycorex
May 3, 10:50 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
As George W. Bush once said.
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, I ... I can't be fooled again.".
As George W. Bush once said.
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, I ... I can't be fooled again.".
![kesha tik tok. [RS+HF] Kesha - Tik Tok](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vTKtwvH3RtMjT9Np2eXsT5AAqzfpE01sVBC9YrBwr0Fbr-Tb3CB4oZypj9CwPMp7snEmIqbdF9ettUyqmbtUOzelJOFA5IZRPzKAYqXJiB-r_GnP-RI0saCdUEIe-sW4xVI3QMJ7cfhLCJQA=s0-d "[RS+HF] Kesha - Tik Tok")
Abstract
Feb 23, 04:54 PM
Finish: To take pictures to the next level you have to do some post processing to make sure brightness, contrast, saturation and sharpness are all good. These images could all do with some work.
I agree 100% with the above. I don't think your photos are bad at all. I think they're good. They just don't have the same "pop" to them as pro photographer photos, and this probably has more to do with post-processing than it does anything else.
Admittedly, I don't do a lot of pp to my images either, and stick to what Lightroom 2.x can do for me. However, I still use it to touch up the contrast, play with the exposure and brightness, black level, and a few other things.
I agree 100% with the above. I don't think your photos are bad at all. I think they're good. They just don't have the same "pop" to them as pro photographer photos, and this probably has more to do with post-processing than it does anything else.
Admittedly, I don't do a lot of pp to my images either, and stick to what Lightroom 2.x can do for me. However, I still use it to touch up the contrast, play with the exposure and brightness, black level, and a few other things.
Shifty
Dec 22, 09:03 PM
meh...it's just to entertain. :)
that must of taken a lot of work :)
I hope not to see this thread turn into a 'MacRumors vs Spymac' war, or a Spymac-bashing thread. :rolleyes:
At the end of the day, we're just mac-related sites full of mac-lovers.
I wonder whether MacRumors will make a trailer? ;)
that must of taken a lot of work :)
I hope not to see this thread turn into a 'MacRumors vs Spymac' war, or a Spymac-bashing thread. :rolleyes:
At the end of the day, we're just mac-related sites full of mac-lovers.
I wonder whether MacRumors will make a trailer? ;)
dubbz
Dec 19, 02:00 PM
Cool :)
more...
gooddeal
May 5, 06:58 AM
I heard that T-mobile still has the $29.99/month plan at the store (not online), 500 whenever minutes + unlimited night, weekend and mobile to mobile.
MacBytes
Oct 4, 02:50 PM
http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)
Category: Tips and How To's
Link: How to Identify if the GeForce 8600M GT of your MacBook Pro Is Defect (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20101004155002)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Category: Tips and How To's
Link: How to Identify if the GeForce 8600M GT of your MacBook Pro Is Defect (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20101004155002)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
more...
dejo
Apr 24, 08:15 AM
You sure you want to release newView? Are you following the memory management rules?
panoz7
Apr 9, 06:18 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8G4)
No, Stella. They are a helluva lot more than just javascript. Go look it up and post your findings.
I came to the same conclusion as Stella after reading both of those linked to stories. These sound just like bookmarklets, except you don't have to manually type in the javascript string. What am I missing? And don't tell me to google it -- I already tried.
Technically, modules are somehow similar to bookmarklets, but with more features and more flexibility. This means the modules are written in JavaScript code and they can do everything that can be done with JavaScript. Unlike bookmarklets, where the complete JavaScript code must be squeezed in one single line so that it can be used as a URL with “javascript” scheme, the modules can be nicely formatted, without any line limitation. Modules have a special header section where the module properties are defined. The properties include an icon that is displayed in the Modules panel of iCab Mobile, but also settings which do allow the user to configure the module in the iCab Mobile module settings panel.
That's from iCAB's website. Yes, technically it's third party code, but so is the javascript on any website. I don't really see the distinction. If malicious javascript can do damage through the modules then I don't see why it couldn't do it through the browser as well.
No, Stella. They are a helluva lot more than just javascript. Go look it up and post your findings.
I came to the same conclusion as Stella after reading both of those linked to stories. These sound just like bookmarklets, except you don't have to manually type in the javascript string. What am I missing? And don't tell me to google it -- I already tried.
Technically, modules are somehow similar to bookmarklets, but with more features and more flexibility. This means the modules are written in JavaScript code and they can do everything that can be done with JavaScript. Unlike bookmarklets, where the complete JavaScript code must be squeezed in one single line so that it can be used as a URL with “javascript” scheme, the modules can be nicely formatted, without any line limitation. Modules have a special header section where the module properties are defined. The properties include an icon that is displayed in the Modules panel of iCab Mobile, but also settings which do allow the user to configure the module in the iCab Mobile module settings panel.
That's from iCAB's website. Yes, technically it's third party code, but so is the javascript on any website. I don't really see the distinction. If malicious javascript can do damage through the modules then I don't see why it couldn't do it through the browser as well.
more...
JZ Wire
Jul 4, 07:53 PM
Ill be going to the Apple store at the Falls. Even though the At&t store is close by but I have a feeling a lot of people will be going there to activate their phones for the first time.
By the way, someone already started a thread for those who are buying an iPhone in Miami.
By the way, someone already started a thread for those who are buying an iPhone in Miami.
Maxq333
May 4, 01:47 PM
To answer your question, I just upgraded from JB 4.3.1 to JB 4.3.2 without restoring. Just updated to stock 4.3.2 in iTunes, then ran redsn0w over it to jailbreak, then reinstalled all my JB packages.
Not sure if not going through a full restore will have any adverse affects, I certainly haven't noticed any yet though!
Oh okay, I'm gonna try it now with 4.3.3.
Not sure if not going through a full restore will have any adverse affects, I certainly haven't noticed any yet though!
Oh okay, I'm gonna try it now with 4.3.3.
more...
ljg93
Apr 15, 10:57 PM
hey everyone i submitted my first app 5 days ago, I was wondering how long it takes to get accepted, ive been stuck in "waiting for review" . Im just looking for some other peoples actual experiences.
also do they accept apps on weekends?
also do they accept apps on weekends?
I WAS the one
Jun 22, 08:12 PM
My Fav is this one: Member Speedy Dingo: App button design entry very professional. Apple-like.
more...
Applejuiced
Mar 14, 01:03 PM
This joke is funny and not over used at all. My favorite part is when you take a shot at the dev team and make your release date a long time away.
Apparently you're one of those guys who believes that the dev team owes you a jailbreak. Honestly if I had one I'd troll all the people like you, who tell the dev team they suck and go ahead and use their jailbreak anyway.
Well said.
Apparently you're one of those guys who believes that the dev team owes you a jailbreak. Honestly if I had one I'd troll all the people like you, who tell the dev team they suck and go ahead and use their jailbreak anyway.
Well said.
![kesha tik tok. Ke$ha KeSha -Tik Tok [EP]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tqPFP5pwzSODAaiIGqjc7HiJW2A6hw4HcHAMUGqXlcJkk6ohPXcvfO0gZFtJcCeSYH8NdloXhQOorFF55-_qhmvPBAB5coQL4uX9zxrNXrm9GxDi0ddGGcs4u0Uge0i3xxN1JBpZOd8R23UA=s0-d "Ke$ha KeSha -Tik Tok [EP]")
djbahdow01
Jul 10, 08:47 PM
I'll be there in the am. Have a service appt. at 7am at Diamond down the road. Will gauge the plan when I get down there.
more...
rikers_mailbox
Aug 17, 06:16 PM
My friend texted me asking if I wanted an old iMac for free, I obviously said yes. It is a snow 600MHz iMac G3 with 512MB of RAM, 40GB HD, and it works wonderfully. I'm currently looking for my 10.4 disks and going to install Tiger on it. Can't wait.
if it's still running OS9, be sure to upgrade firmware before installing OS X
if it's still running OS9, be sure to upgrade firmware before installing OS X
Ashok0
Apr 19, 12:59 PM
My new display has a Mini DisplayPort, but my computer has a DVI connection. I didn't read the tech specs closely and now I have a display that can't connect to my computer. I've read about the Atlona dual link converter, but I've heard that will only work if my graphics card (ATI Radeon HD 2600) supports the resolutions that are available with the display. (I made a mistake in the subject line - my mac pro is early-2008.)
What resolutions does the 27" have, such that I may check that against my current graphic card?
I'm also thinking about just buying a new graphics card. What graphics card will both work with my computer and with the 27" display?
(The page for the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC742ZM/A?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY) at the Apple Store says mid-2010, but my Mac is early-2008. Additionally, my System Profiler says I have PCIe, whereas the previously-mentioned card need PCI Express 2.0. Are these incompatible?)
I'm a but stupid about these things, so thanks for any help.
The ATI Radeon HD 5770 doesn't work with the ACD27". I know it has DisplayPort, but there is a bug with various ATi 5xxx cards which makes them incompatible. It is an ATi issue and there is NO fix.
That being said, all ATI 5xxx EYEFINITY 6 cards with DisplayPort work. All AMD Radeon 6xxx cards with DisplayPort work. And all nVidia GeForce cards with DisplayPort work. You can get a nice GeForce card w/ DP for $150. And any modern video card will support 2560x1440. Any DisplayPort video card on newegg will work for you as long as it isn't an ATi Radeon 5xxx card. You could also buy an Atlona DP400 but its $150, the same as a new video card (ripoff).
What resolutions does the 27" have, such that I may check that against my current graphic card?
I'm also thinking about just buying a new graphics card. What graphics card will both work with my computer and with the 27" display?
(The page for the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC742ZM/A?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY) at the Apple Store says mid-2010, but my Mac is early-2008. Additionally, my System Profiler says I have PCIe, whereas the previously-mentioned card need PCI Express 2.0. Are these incompatible?)
I'm a but stupid about these things, so thanks for any help.
The ATI Radeon HD 5770 doesn't work with the ACD27". I know it has DisplayPort, but there is a bug with various ATi 5xxx cards which makes them incompatible. It is an ATi issue and there is NO fix.
That being said, all ATI 5xxx EYEFINITY 6 cards with DisplayPort work. All AMD Radeon 6xxx cards with DisplayPort work. And all nVidia GeForce cards with DisplayPort work. You can get a nice GeForce card w/ DP for $150. And any modern video card will support 2560x1440. Any DisplayPort video card on newegg will work for you as long as it isn't an ATi Radeon 5xxx card. You could also buy an Atlona DP400 but its $150, the same as a new video card (ripoff).
more...
Brother Michael
Jul 30, 11:29 AM
Truly amazing...I mean I am at a loss for words here...
Mike
Mike
GGJstudios
Mar 16, 10:58 AM
Give this a good read: Forum Rules (http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:Forum_Rules)
mileslong
Mar 16, 03:03 AM
i have the latest developer build of chrome and the latest build of firefox as well and they both work perfectly for me on lion...
Quillz
Jun 29, 04:08 PM
People forget that Apple has first and foremost always been a hardware company, one that produces electronic gadgets. Yes, they started off making computers, but even as early as the late 80s/early 90s, Apple was moving into other directions, such as the Newton (PDA) and the Pippin (video game console.) I don't think that a keynote dedicated to the iPhone is in any way a sign that Mac OS X is being "neglected." It's simply a presentation matter. It's easier to make a 90-minute keynote talking about new features in iPhone OS 2.0 than it is to say, "Snow Leopard will not have any major new features. Whoopee."
Lacero
Mar 30, 10:35 AM
Just pointing out the cost/benefit ratio. In this case, way too money is spent protecting something that doesn't cost a lot. I see protection for shuffles as a waste of money.
quidire
Feb 16, 09:58 AM
I use OmniWeb 5.1 - yes, it is not free after a trial period, but it is the "power user's" browser.
Give it a go, see how you like it. They have educational discounts; its $30, $20 if you are a student.
It really is amazing.
Oh, and other than being a happy customer, I'm not affliated w/ Omnigroup
-RS
Give it a go, see how you like it. They have educational discounts; its $30, $20 if you are a student.
It really is amazing.
Oh, and other than being a happy customer, I'm not affliated w/ Omnigroup
-RS
anng12
Mar 10, 08:02 PM
If anyone is DEFINITELY going to Ardmore and is going to be there before 2:30pm... please PM me and I will give you my phone number and you can text me the status of the lines.
In return, I'll throw in a SuperPoints Invite (the site costs $8 to join) but with an invite.. it's FREE
In return, I'll throw in a SuperPoints Invite (the site costs $8 to join) but with an invite.. it's FREE
nesuser2
Dec 7, 08:38 PM
I can't remember how many pics it will hold but it's in the 1200 range. I just don't like being on vacation and needing to backup...or atleast as often. And I want to point out the fact that cr2sh said this thing is SMALL. You can easily fit it into a pack of cigarettes or roughly compare it to an ipod(little thicker). This camera definitly fits into the highly portable category.
